2008 Woodie Awards
Voting for the lesser of evils
David Chmura
Issue date: 2/26/08 Section: Opinion
Voters across America often put aside their own morals and views when it comes to picking a candidate because too often the candidate is simply the lesser of two evils. In many cases, voters do not even like the candidates or know very little about them and still they vote for them.
Our upcoming presidential election is an excellent example because some women are voting for Hillary Clinton just because they would like to have a woman president. In an article on csmoniter.com said that "National polls give Clinton an extra eight points or so because many women make gender the determinative factor in their choice."
Similarly, some black voters are casting their votes for Barack Obama just because he has black heritage. Sadly, many voters do not know what each candidate really stands for. Further, because Obama and Clinton are the main candidates for the presidency right now, neither is willing to step down. The end result will require a vast percentage of the Democratic Party to side with their not-ideal candidate.
In the Republican Party, many conservatives are voting for a not-so-conservative John McCain simply because their ideal candidate, Mike Huckabee won't have the popularity McCain carries. Huckabee, is considered by many Republicans to be too conservative; his moral views strongly oppose many accepted practices today such as homosexuality and abortion. Because even many Republicans today do not hold to strict conservative views, McCain by default becomes the better Republican candidate because he supports more modern-day views. However, because traditional Republicans are outnumbered, they must side with McCain.
What's wrong with this picture? Many Americans nowadays no longer fully believe in who they vote for. This concept of the "lesser of two evils" candidate is dominating in the political arena to a shocking degree.
Partially responsible for the misalignment that occurs between the voters' choice and voters' picks occurs from the amount of publicized garbage that each candidate slings at one another. Voters often base their picks on whose reputation is the cleanest.
Our upcoming presidential election is an excellent example because some women are voting for Hillary Clinton just because they would like to have a woman president. In an article on csmoniter.com said that "National polls give Clinton an extra eight points or so because many women make gender the determinative factor in their choice."
Similarly, some black voters are casting their votes for Barack Obama just because he has black heritage. Sadly, many voters do not know what each candidate really stands for. Further, because Obama and Clinton are the main candidates for the presidency right now, neither is willing to step down. The end result will require a vast percentage of the Democratic Party to side with their not-ideal candidate.
In the Republican Party, many conservatives are voting for a not-so-conservative John McCain simply because their ideal candidate, Mike Huckabee won't have the popularity McCain carries. Huckabee, is considered by many Republicans to be too conservative; his moral views strongly oppose many accepted practices today such as homosexuality and abortion. Because even many Republicans today do not hold to strict conservative views, McCain by default becomes the better Republican candidate because he supports more modern-day views. However, because traditional Republicans are outnumbered, they must side with McCain.
What's wrong with this picture? Many Americans nowadays no longer fully believe in who they vote for. This concept of the "lesser of two evils" candidate is dominating in the political arena to a shocking degree.
Partially responsible for the misalignment that occurs between the voters' choice and voters' picks occurs from the amount of publicized garbage that each candidate slings at one another. Voters often base their picks on whose reputation is the cleanest.
Be the first to comment on this story