The independent student news site of San Diego Mesa College.

The Mesa Press

The Mesa Press

The independent student news site of San Diego Mesa College.

Breaking News
  • February 27Mysterious burning smell permeates campus; cause under investigation
  • December 17Acting Chancellor Smith named new permanent SDCCD chancellor
  • December 17Women's Volleyball claims state title

The Mesa Press

The Mesa Press

Paid Family Leave bill receives mixed reactions

 

 

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill on April 11 that is going to extend the compensation that Californians will receive during Paid Family Leave (PFL). Of course, there are reactions fitting to either side of the spectrum, which is expected for any kind of political decision.
In order to understand what this new signing does, some background on the previous bill is necessary. According to the PFL website, the bill is explained as an employee being compensated for missing work as long as they are caring for an ill family member or bonding with a new child.
Tending to a family member who is sick includes parents, children, a spouse or a registered domestic partner. Just in 2014, this was also extended to parents-in-law, grandchildren, grandparents and siblings. Also, time off to bond with a new child includes adopted or foster children as well as newborn biological children.
One important thing to point out is that in order to qualify for this paid family leave, the employee in question has to request an application from the California Employment Development Department. Also, it is the workers who contribute to the California State Disability Insurance fund who are permitted to receive the 6 weeks of partial pay when taking time off under the PFL.
Initially, workers would receive 55 percent of their wages during their time off under PFL. Now, after the new signing, Brown has increased this number to 70 percent for those receiving minimum wage, and 60 percent for those with higher pay.
Some have responded to this unhappily, claiming that it is more or less discriminatory. That due to aspects such as the child bearing, it could be more targeted towards women needing time off. However, each parent of a child has the ability to take time off with PFL, and parents even have the option of taking this time off simultaneously, although that is not required.
Some are also angered by the raises in percentage, claiming more raises in taxing is not necessary, especially so soon after the passing of the new $15 minimum wage. However, the new improvements, according to the Los Angeles Times, will be covered by increasing the amount only workers who wish to make use of PFL must pay into the SDI fund.
This bill was already on the side of those who do not have the means required in order to leave work for lengthy amounts of time. For those who have a hard time making ends meet on a weekly basis, and already use most, if not all, of their paychecks in order to keep a family fed and the bills paid, this law provides benefits most states don’t have.
As of now, the only states to actually use a form of compensation during leave are California, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Washington. To put it into perspective, according to the U.S. Census, only about 57 million of the approximate 323,396,580 million people in the country have the ability to take advantage of PFL. That in itself is extremely discomforting, as there are people entering and leaving this world nearly every 10 seconds, and a mass majority of these families already struggle financially without compensation of some kind.
Life is unpredictable. We never know what will happen in the future, whether these things will concern our own well-being or that of our loved ones. It is definitely comforting to know that as human beings, we have this level of security in the form of PFL.

 

Story continues below advertisement
Leave a Comment
Donate to The Mesa Press
$320
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Your donation will support the student journalists of San Diego Mesa College. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Donate to The Mesa Press
$320
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

Here at The Mesa Press, we want to foster a community for civil discussions. We welcome your insight and perspective. Comments posted must be appropriate for all ages. Any profanity or cursing is prohibited. That includes any attempts to curse with special characters (!@#) or spacing. Discuss and criticize ideas. We don’t allow comments that intend to intimidate, demean or harass other readers in any way.
All The Mesa Press Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *